2020-11-05 09:34:46 -07:00
|
|
|
# Decentralized OpenPGP Identity Proofs
|
2020-11-06 10:35:28 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decentralized OpenPGP Identity Proofs, or DOIPs, are a way of identifying
|
|
|
|
and linking profiles and accounts on the internet. Take ten different websites
|
|
|
|
and make an account on each of them. How could outsiders tell they were created
|
|
|
|
by the same person? They can't directly. You could be **Alice** on website A but
|
|
|
|
**Alice123** on website B.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
What if a bad actor creates an account **Alice** on a brand new website and
|
|
|
|
starts contacting people you know from website A? How could they verify this new
|
|
|
|
accounts is in fact you?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
With the digital realm becoming more and more a second home in our lives, we
|
|
|
|
need tools to identify ourselves and stay safe.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Why decentralized?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Say you have a Facebook or Google account. You can use that to create accounts
|
|
|
|
on different websites. Problem solved! That is, until the day you get an email
|
|
|
|
that your account was flagged by AI, you just lost access to all those websites
|
|
|
|
and there's no way to contact them to restore it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This [happens way too often](https://www.businessinsider.com/google-users-locked-out-after-years-2020-10?international=true&r=US&IR=T).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Why does it happen? You are a number to them. Losing you as a user doesn't cost
|
|
|
|
them anything.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Therefore, it is imperative that new solutions give the people **sovereignty**
|
|
|
|
over their identity. How do we do this? By making new solutions
|
|
|
|
**decentralized**.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
**Decentralized** simply means that there is no central authority. In the
|
|
|
|
classic model, you give your data to Facebook or Google and the truth is what
|
|
|
|
they say it is: if they say you no longer exist, then, well, you no longer
|
|
|
|
exist. In the **decentralized** model, you hold your own data and no one can
|
|
|
|
take that away from you. This also means that service providers should fight for
|
|
|
|
you to keep you as a user since **you allow them to use your data**. Any misstep
|
|
|
|
on their behalf and you can take it away.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Why OpenPGP?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To achieve user sovereignty, DOIP relies on **OpenPGP** cryptographic keys. Read
|
|
|
|
more about those keys [here](cryptographickeys.md) but in short: they are like
|
|
|
|
documents that the whole world can read but only you can edit. In that way, you
|
|
|
|
can publish a list of profiles on websites that you have created but no one can
|
|
|
|
do that for you in an attempt to impersonate you.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Bidirectional linking
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There's a catch: simply adding a link to a profile inside your OpenPGP document
|
|
|
|
is not sufficient. If it were, you could claim any profile anywhere simply by
|
|
|
|
linking to them!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This is why DOIP uses two-way or bidirectional linking. Your key must link to a
|
|
|
|
profile and your profile must link back to the key. That is the only way to make
|
|
|
|
sure you hold both the key and the profile.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This also solves the imposter problem. A bad actor could you link to your
|
|
|
|
profile but since your profile doesn't link back to their key, DOIP will not
|
|
|
|
verify their claim. Unless they hacked your profile, in which case you have more
|
|
|
|
urgent problems.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
How does a profile link to a cryptographic key? Every key can be uniquely
|
|
|
|
identified using what we call their **fingerprint**. All a profile page needs to
|
|
|
|
do is contain that fingerprint somehow. Usually, this can be added as the last
|
|
|
|
line to a biography.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note that the service provider itself needs to do a few things to support the
|
|
|
|
verification of DOIPs. Please refer to the [list of supported service providers](serviceproviders.md)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Adding more than one proof
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The endgame of using DOIP is to add at least two profile. Proving that you own
|
|
|
|
a single profile—in a way—doesn't prove anything. The issue is that
|
|
|
|
we cannot prove that **you**, the physical being **you**, holds that key. DOIP
|
2020-11-07 18:05:34 -07:00
|
|
|
can only verify that "_whoever holds that key also holds that profile_".
|
2020-11-06 10:35:28 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By adding at least two profiles, you can create meaningful links between those
|
|
|
|
profiles. If someone knows **you**, the physical being **you**, is **Alice** on
|
|
|
|
website A, they will also now know that you are **Alice123** on website B,
|
2020-11-07 18:05:34 -07:00
|
|
|
simply because "_whoever holds that key also holds both of those profiles_".
|
2020-11-07 02:18:55 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Why the snail logo?
|
|
|
|
|
2020-11-07 18:05:34 -07:00
|
|
|
> Aren't snails associated with slowness?
|
2020-11-07 02:18:55 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Well, they are also animals that take their homes with them wherever they go. In
|
|
|
|
a sense, they are a nice metaphor for DOIP. Snails are the ultimate
|
|
|
|
"decentralized life" species of the animal kingdom. They don't have to rely on
|
|
|
|
centralized (social) structures, they are self-sufficient by always having their
|
|
|
|
home and their identity—and their data!—with them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
> Yeah, but… Snails are slow, though!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You know what, let's embrace the Big Slow. DOIP is slow. Not computationally
|
|
|
|
slow. DOIP is just a slow technology. It doesn't provide a social network, it
|
|
|
|
doesn't send notifications or reminders, it doesn't want your attention. DOIP is
|
|
|
|
more set-and-forget. Set your identities and the technology handles the rest. As
|
|
|
|
long as your public keys are live, they'll just continue to work without your
|
|
|
|
intervention.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
So yes, it's a **Slow Technology**.
|